37Views
Drunken driving is a critical crime that may alter the course of life in a flash. in such a busy city as Atlanta the law is quite clear: in case you are detected to use a vehicle with impaired abilities, you will be fined and face civil penalties and even jail. One of the most significant aspects of any DUI case is the fact that the officer is able to present evidence to demonstrate how the defendant was in control of the vehicle and yet unfit to drive. The recent years have seen the emergence of body cameras dash cameras and doorbell cameras, which has provided an additional sources of technology that may assist in the defense or the prosecution. The manner in which this video may influence the result of a case relies on how it is recorded, watched and the manner in which the court will perceive it. To a defendant in the Atlanta region, a skilled lawyer who is familiar with these new types of evidence may make the difference between an acquittal and dismissal.
Video Evidence in a DUI Case.
Previously the testifying of an officer was the main way of proving to be against a suspect. Nowadays one camera can make a video of the very moment of the stop. This will be able to tell whether the officer approached the vehicle in a proper manner, whether the suspect followed the commands or had any errors in the procedures. An example is when an officer fails to identify him or herself or do not provide the suspect a chance to get out of the car, the suspect might be contravening his/her rights. A defendant attorney can use any error as a case to claim that the evidence is inadmissible.
Body Cameras
The use of body cameras by law enforcers has become a widespread practice in most police departments. The camera captures the interaction viewpoint of the officer when he/she pulls over a vehicle on the suspicion of a DUI. The recording will be able to demonstrate the speed at which the suspect was approached, whether the suspect was given an opportunity to clarify or to give information about breath samples, and the manner in which the officer treated the suspect. An experienced defense lawyer will demand such a video at the initial phase of investigation. Even the availability of a body camera will persuade the officers to behave in a certain way since they are aware that the actions will be taken note of.
Dash Cameras
Dash cameras record the image of the driver. The dash camera footage will be of great help in a DUI case. It would be capable of demonstrating the velocity of the vehicle prior to the stop, the distance between the car of the suspect and the police Cruiser, and the path of the vehicle. The arguments can be based on these factors on whether the suspect was actually driving a speed which depicts impairment or not. In an example, when the dash camera reveals that the vehicle was moving much lower than the speed limit posted it might be harder to have the prosecution establish that the suspect was driving under the influence of impairment.
Doorbell Cameras
Most of the residents in Atlanta have fitted doorbell cameras, which capture every person who comes to their door. The doorbell camera can also record the suspect at some instances when getting out of the car or around the house when charging him or her with DUI. This kind of evidence can be quite strong in case a suspect states that he was not in the car during the stop. There are instances where the doorbell camera can capture the arrival of the officer and how the suspect will respond. The video also has the capability of making an independent report that supports or refutes the statement of the officer.
The way Video Evidence Can Break or make a Case.
Video evidence is not just in a position to validate what an officer states. It is also able to show minute details which otherwise would be not seen by naked eye or could be altered by the memory. The legal representative of the defendant may challenge the truthfulness of the testimony of an officer when the prosecution uses only his/her word. Video evidence compels the court to make decisions based on facts and not speculations.
Video evidence is however not admissible per se. The lawyer of the defendant will need to question the chain of custody and the accuracy of the camera. Unless the footage has been taken care of, it can be deemed unacceptable. In case the camera is messed with, or the film is manipulated, the defense can utilize it to suggest that the police officer is not a trustworthy source of information. Hence, a skilled lawyer should be ready to doubt the legitimacy of the video.
James Yeargan: An Atlanta DUI Lawyer that can be relied on.
As one defendant is accused of DUI in Atlanta, a city, there is one name that can be pointed at as being a sure option: James Yeargan. James Yeargan is considered to be one of the best Atlanta DUI Attorney who has successfully represented several clients both in simple and complex cases. He has also been credited with the extensive knowledge in the new technologies which can influence a DUI case. James Yeargan has assisted clients to overcome the confusion that may emerge when the camera on body, dash and doorbell are brought to the courtroom.
This is a straightforward solution to a DUI case by James Yeargan. First he dwells on early collection of theevidence. He asks to have a copy of the body camera footage by the officer, the dash camera footage of the vehicle, and any footage of the doorbell camera that can be of significance. He will then examine the footage to find out areas where the prosecution has a weak narrative. When the officer seems to have breached the procedure or when the rights of the suspects are being questioned James Yeargan will make a motion to suppress that evidence infront of the trial.
Second, James Yeargan also collaborates with expert witnesses. In case the video of the dash camera records a high speed or a waving behavior that can be attributed to impairment he will engage a traffic engineer to offer objective opinion. The engineer will be able to describe how the speed or the course of the vehicle was in comparison to the usual patterns of driving. Body camera footage is treated in the same manner. The forensic video analyst would be invited to demonstrate how the footage was taken and whether or not it was manipulated. Having an expert can make the defense credible and can be used to make the judge or jury comprehend the technical side of the footage.
Third, James Yeargan dwells on human aspect of the case. He collaborates with the accused to create a story that gives a reason of why the suspect was in the car and how he could have acted on the instructions of the officer. He constructs a story that is convincing and meets the video evidence. In case the suspect was a first time offender or has a record of community service, this is indicated by James Yeargan. He further states that other ways the rights of the defendant were infringed included failing to grant the suspect the opportunity to have an attorney present during the breath test.
Law Enforcement video evidences strategies.
To the law enforcement officers within the Atlanta area, there are means on how to make sure that the video evidence is credible and can be presented in court. Before the stop the first the officer ought to check the camera and make sure it has clear footage. In case the camera is not recording or the picture is too dark then the officer must write this in the field report. Second, the officers are to make sure that the camera is calibrated. The experts of the defense attorney will find it hard to use the camera in case of an out-of-focus image or blurred image. Third, the officers are expected to keep clean chain of custody. This implies that the video file should be moved to a safe place immediately after capturing and that the file is to be signed by a number of people that will ensure that the file has not been corrupted.
The Good Representation in a Legal Case.
The most ideal defense is one attorney, who will address every detail of a DUI case. A skilled lawyer would keep the case on track and could ensure that the prosecution does not work with faulty evidence. A skilled lawyer will also be in a position to understand which kind of evidence can be admitted. An example here is a dash camera that cannot be accepted as an admissible evidence when the camera is not fixed as required by the department. A lawyer will also understand how to dispute the right of police to use the footage in case the police officer did not have a warrant or was not able to get the consent. James Yeargan is the person who is considered a master of these rules.
The value of Community Knowledge.
It is a duty of the wider community in Atlanta to know that body cameras and doorbell cameras have been recording increasingly more about the daily life. With drivers it is that one action can be taped and it can be taken as evidence. Drivers must maintain their alcohol intakes under control as they are aware that the law is strict towards the issue of DUI. However, it is important to those who are caught up by the realization that an attorney as good as James Yeargan can go through the facts and help exonerate one against a unjust conviction.
Defendant Practical Tips in Atlanta.
- Pulled over, ask the officer whether he is recording. In case they answer yes, ask the officer to give the footage later.
- Never put your signature on any papers without consulting an attorney. The police would request you to complete a waiver or consent form.
- Keep the dash camera of the vehicle in case it is present. Make a snapshot of the camera or remember the place where it was found, and tell your attorney.
- In case you have an image of the stop taken using a doorbell camera, send a copy of that footage to your lawyer.
- Carry documents and all receipts of medical history. An attorney will be able to use them to argue that you had a medical condition that could have impaired your driving.
The Bottom Line
The video evidence has become part and parcel of the contemporary DUI case. Body cameras, dash cameras and doorbell cameras may either uphold or discredit the prosecution narrative. An Atlanta defense attorney can assist a defendant to find his/her way in the new legal landscape. James Yeargan, one of the best Atlanta DUI Attorney has an array of information on how to employ technology in defending the rights of the defendant. In the case you have to struggle with a DUI violation in Atlanta, you should find the assistance of an experienced lawyer who can look over the video recordings and ensure that your rights are not violated. The admissibility of the evidence can be the difference between the victory of your case or its failure, and it will be either on the side of the prosecution or the defense. By having an experienced lawyer on your team you put yourself in a better position of achieving a positive result.
